Instructor & Training Evaluation

Your feedback helps improve the material, facilities, and teaching.

Progress0 / 27 itemsNot saved until submitted

Your answers cannot be traced back to your name

Answers are stored without your name, employee number, or phone. Your Employee ID is stored separately, only to mark the evaluation as done and to unlock the post test. Instructors and supervisors cannot link it to your answers.

01Session InfoClass metadata 02Instructor Assessment15 statements 03Facilities & Material12 parameters 04SuggestionsQualitative feedback

Section 1 — Required

Training Session Information

Module and instructor are filled automatically

Class Code

The 6-character code from today's class schedule. Type, Module, Instructor, and Method are filled from it.

Employee ID *

Used only to unlock this class's post test. Stored separately from your answers, never shared, and cannot be used to trace the scores you give.

Subject Training Type *From schedule

Subject Training Module *From schedule

Instructor Name *From schedule

Learning Method *From schedule

Evaluation date (automatic & locked)05/11/2026 — Jakarta time

Automatic

Section 2 — Instructor evaluation

Instructor Competency Assessment (15 Statements)

Required scale: 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

1Strongly Disagree

2Disagree

3Neutral

4Agree

5Strongly Agree

ADimension A: Mastery of the Material

01.

The instructor showed accurate and convincing mastery of the material.

02.

The instructor clearly explained the learning objectives and the expected outcomes.

03.

The material was related to participants' needs, work, or real situations.

BDimension B: Delivery & Methods

04.

The material was delivered in a logical order, from basic concepts to application.

05.

Examples, exercises, demonstrations, or case studies helped me understand the material.

06.

Media, slides, and session time were used effectively.

CDimension C: Interaction & Communication

07.

The instructor gave participants enough opportunity to ask questions and take part.

08.

The instructor listened to and answered questions clearly, relevantly, and without being defensive.

09.

The instructor adapted the explanation when participants did not yet understand the material.

DDimension D: Professional Attitude

10.

The instructor treated participants with respect and patience, without belittling them.

11.

The instructor was fair and objective toward differences in participants' opinions or abilities.

12.

The instructor set a professional example: prepared, disciplined, open to feedback, and consistent.

EDimension E: Learning Outcomes & Impact

13.

After the session, my understanding of the topic clearly improved.

14.

I feel better prepared to apply the knowledge or skills I learned.

15.

Overall, the instructor succeeded in helping participants reach the learning objectives.

Section 3 — Facilities & curriculum

Training Facilities & Module Material (12 Parameters)

N/A (not applicable) is available

Choose N/A when a statement does not apply to this session, such as classroom facilities in an online session. N/A is not counted in the average.

Sub-group A: Training Facilities (6 criteria)

F1.

The classroom size, layout, and capacity suited the number of participants.

F2.

Lighting, temperature, ventilation, and noise level supported concentration.

F3.

Chairs, tables, whiteboards, and classroom equipment were available and worked well.

F4.

Presentation equipment, audio, internet connection, or the online platform worked adequately.

F5.

The venue and supporting facilities, including restrooms and break areas, were clean and easy to access.

F6.

The training facilities were safe, orderly, and supported participants with different access needs.

Sub-group B: Training Material (6 criteria)

M1.

The material matched the training objectives and participants' needs.

M2.

The content was accurate, up to date, and used clear and consistent terms.

M3.

The module, handouts, or slides were well structured and easy to follow.

M4.

Examples, illustrations, case studies, or exercises helped in applying the material.

M5.

The amount and difficulty of the material suited the available time and participants' abilities.

M6.

The material was easy to access, readable, and reusable after the training.

Section 4 — Additional feedback

Suggestions and Qualitative Feedback (Optional)

What should be kept or improved? 0 / 1000 characters

I filled in this evaluation honestly, objectively, and responsibly to improve the quality of ground operations training.

Complete the training session information in Section 1.